https://eternal-monologue.net/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=OS-tan_fallacyOS-tan fallacy - Revision history2026-06-27T21:40:12ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.45.3https://eternal-monologue.net/index.php?title=OS-tan_fallacy&diff=11&oldid=prevKotorifan: Created page with "OS-tan fallacy is a kind of fallacy that happens when you assume an OS to resememble its OS-tan. == Example == Do you see this picture? Objectively, you would assume NetBSD to be the best OS, closely followed by DragonflyBSD, then FreeBSD, and then OpenBSD. However, NetBSD is a pain in the ass to do anything with and has fewer reedemable features than OpenBSD, even though the cuteness and attractiveness of the OS-tans would have indicated otherwise."2026-06-27T08:20:46Z<p>Created page with "OS-tan fallacy is a kind of fallacy that happens when you assume an OS to resememble its OS-tan. == Example == Do you see this picture? Objectively, you would assume NetBSD to be the best OS, closely followed by DragonflyBSD, then FreeBSD, and then OpenBSD. However, NetBSD is a pain in the ass to do anything with and has fewer reedemable features than OpenBSD, even though the cuteness and attractiveness of the OS-tans would have indicated otherwise."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>OS-tan fallacy is a kind of fallacy that happens when you assume an OS to resememble its OS-tan.<br />
<br />
== Example ==<br />
Do you see this picture? Objectively, you would assume NetBSD to be the best OS, closely followed by DragonflyBSD, then FreeBSD, and then OpenBSD. However, NetBSD is a pain in the ass to do anything with and has fewer reedemable features than OpenBSD, even though the cuteness and attractiveness of the OS-tans would have indicated otherwise.</div>Kotorifan